Brain defect underlies the difficulties
of dyslexia But biological
problems can be overcome with intensive training
A defect in a single part of the brain may underlie the reading difficulties of
dyslexics, but intensive training can help them overcome their problems and allow
them to read. The findings, presented Thursday at the annual meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science, could help researchers find a better
way to diagnose and treat at-risk children before reading problems appear.
For years, no one knew what caused dyslexia,
which afflicts 10% of the population. They did know, however, that the difficulties
of dyslexics are not caused by a poor education or low intelligence. Studies from
the last few years have hinted at a biological cause, says Thomas Zeffiro, MD,
PhD. But reading is a complex task performed by several parts of the brain, so
no one was sure which part was malfunctioning, he says. Zeffiro is co-director
of the Georgetown Center for the Study of Learning at Georgetown University Medical
Center in Washington, D.C. To find out,
Zeffiro, Guinevere Eden, DPhil, the other co-director of the Georgetown center,
and their colleagues examined the brains of dyslexics and normal subjects using
a brain-imaging method called functional magnetic resonance imagining -- a variant
of the brain-scanning procedures doctors use to diagnose brain maladies that can
detect changes in brain activity. Although
it seems simple, reading is a complex task, says Eden. Readers must see symbols
and deduce what they mean, sound out words in their head, and grasp what each
sound means. "Children who are good at this succeed in reading," Eden says.
Thirty-seven subjects -- 20 with dyslexia and
17 who read normally -- were monitored as they read and as they tried to detect
moving dots on a computer screen. Dyslexics have problems with both tasks. An
area of the brain called the left parietal lobe lit up for both tasks in both
groups, but it lit up less for dyslexics. That meant that a single brain defect
underlies both tasks, pointing to a common brain defect that goes awry in dyslexia.
The work is "further evidence that dyslexia has
biological roots," says Eden. And it is
important because it shows that "dyslexia is not an auditory problem and not a
visual problem -- it's a problem with the auditory-visual connection," says Frank
Wood, PhD, chief of neuropsychiatry at Wake Forest University School of Medicine
in Winston-Salem, N.C. To see if those
biological problems can be overcome, Eden and her colleagues did brain scans on
20 dyslexic adults, then put 10 of them on an intensive training program. The
program, which was designed to improve reading skills, consisted of three hours
per day of training for eight weeks. The
10 dyslexics who received the training learned to read, even forming a book club
at the end of the training period. What's more, they compensated for the weak
performance of their left parietal lobe by learning to use their right parietal
lobe. According to Eden, the results show that the adult brain is capable of change.
"It says you shouldn't give up on adult dyslexics," she says.
Knowing a biological cause for dyslexia should help researchers come up with better
ways of diagnosing the disorder. Currently, most children are not diagnosed as
dyslexics until they are in the second or third grade and have a hard time reading.
"As a society, we're not doing a very good job at diagnosing children at risk
for reading failure," Zeffiro says. But
understanding the specific brain functions and regions that go awry should allow
researchers to come up with better diagnostic tests for children as young as 4
or 5. Those at-risk children could be directed to an intervention program that
would help them learn to read better, Zeffiro says.
Parents should be aware that young children are at risk of dyslexia if at least
one parent or relative has it, says Wood. And they should also be wary of quick
and easy fixes for dyslexia. "Dyslexia can only be treated by trained teachers,"
he says. By Dan Ferber, PhD
WebMD Medical News
Reviewed by Dr. Charlotte E. Grayson Feb.
16, 2001 (San Francisco) With thanks to
WebMD Medical News
|